Just saw a headline on Yahoo's homepage:
President says Jenna married a 'good guy'
Whew! That was a big concern of mine. That isn't actually the headline for the story...yet. But we can hope. People need to know.
Oops, just checked my Bush Propaganda Decoder Ring. Turns out that this means Jenna's new husband is the guy responsible for creating cancer. Dammit! Why couldn't she have married a "heckeva guy," which only means he's responsible for not stopping disasters? Why'd she have to go for the "good" guy?
And reporters sure have weird standards. The article mentioned that the wedding was "bi-partisan" because the minister had endorsed Obama. And isn't that just the way it is? Sure, both families are Republican, including a family that has two Republican presidents in it, but it's "bi-partisan" just because somebody involved was a Democrat. Typical.