And I'm reminded of this reading Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio saying "I have a feeling the situation in Iran would be a little different if they had a 2nd amendment like ours." Yeah, because that's the only thing that's stopping that from happening here.
And seriously, if Iran had our 1st, 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments, I don't think they'd be needing that 2nd one right now. And it's the lack of all these other rights that would make the 2nd one useful right now. And so Rubio expresses support for the amendment which could lead to civil war in Iran, while ignoring the ones that would make war unnecessary.
But to conservatives, their shotguns and assault rifles are the only things preserving these other amendments, so the 2nd one is the one for them. And too many of them sound as if they'd actually prefer that the government test their ability to defend themselves; as if the mundaneness of modern life is simply too taxing on their manly sense of duty. They'd rather fight our government than have it work to make their lives better. As I said, frightening.
American conservatives: Protecting American liberty one gun at a time.
I just spent about a half an hour with Google trying to find out what gun laws exist in Iran, with absolutely no luck.
None of these people shooting their mouths off has a clue about gun ownership in Iran, but why should that stop them?
I read a right wing post yesterday on the subject of "What will Obamacare mean for gun rights?" Well what I really want to know is, what will Obamacare mean for gun rights in Iran.
Think about that, left wing pinkos.
I want to know what Caregun means for Obamarights. I suspect it's something really really bad or the exact opposite.
Post a Comment