Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Time to Bomb Iran

A victory for Iran?!? NOOOOOOOO! This can't happen. I don't give a damn whether or not Iran has nuclear bombs, WE CANNOT ALLOW THEM TO HAVE VICTORY OVER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! So I say we help out their nuclear ambitions by sending them a few nukes of our own. And if those backward bozos are so bumbling that they can't handle our delivery without blowing the things to smithereens, well that's their problem, isn't it. We were just trying send them a nice victory package.

USA!!! USA!!!

P.S. What the hell does this mean: A new U.S. intelligence review concluding Iran stopped developing an atomic weapons program in 2003 is a "declaration of victory" for Iran's nuclear program, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Wednesday.

A victory for Iran's nuclear program? It's a victory because they couldn't figure out how to build a bomb? Needless to say, there is no actual quote in the article of Ahmadinejad saying this was a victory for their nuclear program. He said it was a victory for the Iranian nation. But I guess for some reporters, those two terms are synonymous. Were it not for Iran's supposed nuclear program, these people wouldn't even know the place existed.

Oh, and don't miss the part where Condi says that we still need another round of sanctions. She suggests we've been "completely transparent" about what was in the NIE, despite the fact that they've been pretending it didn't exist for the past few months and are, even now, trying to spin what it says so they can still attack Iran. For Bushies, "transparency" just means that you weren't able to stop people from seeing a report, even if you're going to continue to trick people about what the report says and act as if it didn't exist. Right.


Ron Paul said...

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for freedumb.

Doctor Biobrain said...

That's pretty good, Ron.

pud said...

what a load.