Federal drug agents won't pursue pot-smoking patients or their sanctioned suppliers in states that allow medical marijuana, under new legal guidelines to be issued Monday by the Obama administration.That fucking bastard! How dare he pretend as if he's the first person ever to think we should allow states to decide if their sick people can smoke pot! I was thinking that a good ten months before Obama issued this declaration, during a late night bull session at the dorm. How dare he claim this policy for his own! How dare he think he invented legalization! I was ranting about this very issue when Bush was in office, and now that Obama is in office and is doing what I thought Bush should have done, well WOOP-TEE-DOO! I was already thinking that WAY before Bush Obama said it now.
And that makes him a sell-out in my book. A total and complete sell-out, worse than Bush. Because at least Bush had the honesty to tell us he was screwing us over, while Obama keeps saying the words I've always thought I wanted my president to say, yet hasn't accomplished everything that I would have accomplished were anyone to elect me Emperor of the World. And if you don't see how that makes him a sell-out, well tough!
And check out this media tonguebath they gave him:
The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.Yeah, they say this is a departure from Bush. They say... But they would wouldn't they? The truth is that Bush would have done what Barack is doing if Bush thought that Barack should do what Bush failed to do when we had Bush to do what Barack should have done in the first place. That's just common sense.
And so Barack isn't any better than Bush, if Bush was as good as Barack; and anyone would have been as good as another, if none of them had decided to run. And that's why we need to force everyone to accept a third party system, because these same people keep winning in these same elections. I wonder why that is? Perhaps so that they can avoid finally announcing that I'm the Emperor of the World? Probably so, because I have all the answers; if only somebody would bother to ask me.
Seriously, Though
And so, yeah, Barack is completely changing the Bush policy on pot legalization regarding the state's rights issue. Because hey, if California wants to be stoned, let it be stone. How does THAT hurt Nevada? If anything, legalizing a crime in one state will make it less likely that people will commit that crime in a nearby state, as all the criminals would flow to the legal state. And so if you want criminals out of your state, you should want to have a neighboring state who allows that crime to be committed in their state.
And thanks to Obama, all California has to do is to finally admit that they all want to smoke marijuana and the Feds have already agreed to allow them to do so. And let's face it, that's what the whole "Medical Marijuana" thing was all about. I mean, really, if sick people can smoke it, why can't the healthy people? Or something along those lines. And if California voters approve it, Obama has already promised that his people won't stop it. That's what this new policy means.
Woohoo! Who knew state's rights could be so fun? Next thing you know, they'll lift prohibition and finally put an end to Al Capone's evil reign. We can only hope...
1 comment:
People who claim all politicians are the same are annoying. I thought it was annoying because this view was an excuse not to pay attention and to blame all politicians for the sins or some. "Both sides do it," is a classic response when Republicans get caught doing something. But trying to prove Obama is the same as Bush is different approach. It's actively trying to prove that a visibly better politician is still just as bad. What is the fear here? If we believe we have a good president then we are more susceptible to the bad ones?
Post a Comment