And so I'm reading about how a conservative pollster polled conservative bloggers regarding The 25 Worst Figures In American History, eighteen of which were liberals; most of whom are still living. Either American history has gotten a whole lot worse in recent years or conservatives have very short memories. And someone commenting on that noted that none of the people listed were Civil War Confederates, which should be odd, seeing as how the Civil War was surely the most perilous time in our history.
I mean, imagine if Al Qaeda could even remove one state from the Union, and you can begin to understand why having a bunch of them leave at once might be a problem. But apparently, it'd only be a problem if terrorists or liberals did such a thing. But if REAL Americans want to destroy America, it's an American thing to do. Or something like that.
And here's the comment you've been waiting for, in response to the mention of Confederates as "worst figures."
Hardly shocking since the leaders of the Confederacy simply took their states out the Union as would be presumed since those states voluntarily joined. Their dispute was entirely political over an unfortunate system that was entirely legal in the US until the Union outlawed slavery in the states outside of Union control to avoid a negotiated settlement.Of course. They were just exercising their right to end their voluntary cooperation with the other states, so naturally that's not a bad thing for America at all. But of course, it was. I mean, even if it can be argued that these states were within their rights to secede (they weren't), that should still put them on the American history shit list.
But no. Apparently, it's perfectly acceptable to destroy half of America, if you're having a political dispute with a group that won't negotiate. Oh, and as a correction, in case you needed one: The Union HADN'T outlawed slavery prior to secession. In fact, seven states had withdrawn from the Union before Lincoln even took office.
This wasn't a reaction to imperious federalism. This was a powerplay by people upset that they had lost an election. (Huh, I wonder why that sounds so familiar.)
And the big joke is his "voluntarily joined" nonsense. Just because you voluntarily signed a contract doesn't mean you get to unilaterially get out of it, and there was no provision in the Constitution to withdraw from it. Once they signed in, they were stuck with it. And if that wasn't the case, then the states wouldn't have been so wary of joining. If it had been assumed that they could withdraw whenever they liked, there wouldn't have been a problem. And hell, if anyone gets into a contract involuntarily, they have more right to invalidate it than if they get into it voluntarily. I fail to see why it should be assumed that the Constitution has an escape clause.
And the southern states knew that, as their argument for leaving wasn't that their participation was voluntary, but rather, that America had failed to uphold their part of the contract; thus voiding the contract. And that IS a valid reason to get out of a contract. You can read South Carolina's Declaration of Secession, which lays out their case that that by creating laws that opposed slavery, Northern states were infringing upon the Southern state's rights by not enforcing slavery in Northern states.
So basically, if Southern states weren't allowed to subvert laws in Northern states, this somehow violated the rights of Southern states. And again, this "victimhood by not permitting me to victimize others" somehow rings a bell for me.
I was going to finish this post, but screw it. I have too many of these unfinished posts lying around, so I figure it's best just to submit it unfinished than to let it die. You can just fill in the rest by giving a recap of the opening, and imagining that I've tied it all back together with some pithy phrase that shows how stupid it is for conservatives to continue to defend secession.
Oh, and I also forgot to include a section on the second half of his comment, in which he explains that treason by the Confederates is comparable to FDR creating Social Security and regulations. Yet oddly, Roosevelt really WAS on the list, while no Confederates were. Conservatives are very weird people.