tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494384.post551351843114748507..comments2024-03-04T04:09:01.839-06:00Comments on And Doctor Biobrain's Response Is...: Huckabee's EvolutionDoctor Biobrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01641661532899934766noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494384.post-63369745148307980372008-01-22T01:27:00.000-06:002008-01-22T01:27:00.000-06:00James H - The Catholic Church believes in evolutio...James H - The Catholic Church believes in evolution. They are not creationists. Huckabee says he does not believe in evolution, but says that God put evolution in motion and believes that McCain's mom gave him good genes. This doesn't even make sense.<BR/><BR/>As a refresher: The evolution v. creation debate has nothing to do with the origins of the universe. If you believe that God created the process we call evolution, then you believe in evolution (as the Catholic Church does). If you believe that God created everything as-is, then you're a creationist. And then there's the whole "Intelligent Design" thing, which can mean just about anything, as long as God's involved and evolution is insulted. <BR/><BR/>But Huckabee's statements just seem to be a gibberish mix of all this. Of course, if he really doesn't know the difference between these positions, he probably shouldn't be talking about them until he learns a little more.Doctor Biobrainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01641661532899934766noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494384.post-38187066415835349432008-01-21T20:05:00.000-06:002008-01-21T20:05:00.000-06:00Catholic Supporter of Huckabee here.I really don't...Catholic Supporter of Huckabee here.<BR/><BR/>I really don't think Huckabee is doing a "con job" here. When people here terms like Evoultion, Creationist etc they all visions of what those terms mean.<BR/><BR/>For instance I am pretty sure Huckabee is not a Young earth Creationist. He believes that God created amn etcetc. However as most Evangelicals and a good many Catholics we are not so much put into the extremes of other camps<BR/><BR/>That is real lifeJames Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00406049343115557137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7494384.post-13439140076068502382008-01-21T08:46:00.000-06:002008-01-21T08:46:00.000-06:00THE NEW DISCIPLINE! Things will never be the same...THE NEW DISCIPLINE!<BR/> <BR/>Things will never be the same in academia after this.<BR/> <BR/>There is a new discipline on the scene: physical science, the old science of cause and effect. <BR/>Against the backdrop of a nation embroiled in debate and legal battles over whether creationism or evolution, or both, should be taught in the classroom, The Quest for Right proclaims a<BR/> <BR/>DAY OF VICTORY!<BR/> <BR/>The Quest for Right, a series of seven textbooks designed for the public schools, represents the ultimate marriage between an in-depth knowledge of biblical phenomena and natural and physical sciences. As a result, the several volumes have accomplished that which, heretofore, was deemed impossible: to level the playing field between those who desire a return to physical science in the classroom and those who embrace the theory of evolution. The Quest for Right turns the tide by providing an authoritative and en- lightening scientific explanation of natural phenomena which will ultimately replace the unprofitable Darwinian view.<BR/> <BR/>The backbone of Darwinism is not biological evolution per se, but electronic interpretation, the tenet that all physical, chemical, and biological processes result from a change in the electron structure of the atom which, in turn, may be deciphered through the orderly application of mathematics, as outlined in quantum mechanics. A few of the supporting theories are: degrading stars, neutron stars, black holes, extraterrestrial water, antimatter, the absolute dating systems, and the big bang, the explosion of a singularity infinitely smaller than the dot of an “i” from which space, time, and the massive stellar bodies supposedly sprang into being. <BR/> <BR/>The philosophy rejects any divine intervention. Therefore, let the philosophy of Darwinism be judged on these specifics: electron interpretation and quantum mechanics. Conversely, the view that God is both responsible for and rules all the phenomena of the universe will stand or fall when the facts are applied. The view will not hinge on faith alone, but will be tested by the weightier principle of verifiable truths – the new discipline. <BR/> <BR/>The Quest for Right is not only better at explaining natural phenomena, but also may be verified through testing. As a result, the material in the several volumes will not violate the so-called constitutional separation of church and state. Physical science, the old science of cause and effect, will have a long-term sustainability, replacing irresponsible doctrines based on whim. Teachers and students will rejoice in the simplicity of earthly phenomena when entertained by the new discipline. You will not want to miss the adventure of a lifetime that awaits you in Volume 1 of The Quest for Right, by C. David Parsons. <BR/> <BR/>Visit the official website for additional information: http://questforright.com/ <BR/> <BR/>“A book that will change the world.” – Wayne Lin, Editor, Tate Publishing LLCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com